Wednesday, 16 June 2010

There's no such thing as a free lunch


...so should you charge for assessments?

Finishing off an enjoyable lunch with a client recently I wondered as I picked up the bill, whether he saw this as a free lunch or a fair reward for his time and attention? I’d had a chance to pitch some new ideas from NewField IT and learn a bit more about his plans, in return for a small expense. But, how would I have felt if he was just a prospect and I had to go to the most expensive restaurant in town with fine wines and no guarantee of securing business at the end of it? Surely this is the reserve of a customer who has provided substantial business, yet many in our industry face an equal dilemma when asked to provide a free assessment, worth thousands of dollars in manpower.

The irony is that management in most MPS providers themselves think of an assessment as nothing more than a ‘free lunch’ – a necessary, but low value activity that is part of winning an MPS contract. Few respect that an assessment, depending on its scope, is as much a discovery for the customer as it is for them. If the customer knew how many devices they had, who used them and to what degree, where they were located, and whether they were leveraging the technology to optimise processes, then the assessment wouldn’t be needed. It stands to reason that the larger the organisation is the higher the complexity around printing becomes and therefore the greater the value in knowing exactly what is going on and how much it costs.

This disconnect between the service of providing an assessment and the value of the assessment has come about because many early assessments were nothing more than an elaborate sales proposal (typically limited to a USB stick collecting meter reads and a cursory walk around). The deliverable was reams of volume data in different configurations that the customer was expected to wade through and a current cost analysis based on what I have previously referred to as guerrilla economics*. Now, however, the shift to managed print services has accelerated and the role of the assessment has become much more significant in establishing the business case for change and a solid scope of work.

So for those MPS providers struggling to start charging for something they have traditionally given away for free, my advice is to look at an assessment like a professional French chef would a meal; starting by categorising assessments into four groups, much like the courses of a meal.

The first group is for pilot assessments, equivalent to the amuse-bouche or appetizer and usually provided without charge; a small indicator of the expertise of the chef, hinting at the delights to come. This could be the volume assessment of a floor, or a department, with devices mapped, but nothing more. Options for more detailed work should be presented; however, the value of each option must be clearly indicated, similar to a menu.

The next level of assessment, the hors-d’oeuvres in my analogy, goes into another level of detail. This could involve the odd user interview and a simple cost of ownership approach based on industry standards; something that can be done quickly and without too much time commitment. The client sees value now but is not fully committed (there is still the main course to come after all).

The main assessment though is like the Plat Principal, a signature dish, always chargeable because of the value, knowledge and expertise of the professional who creates it. This type of assessment will include detailed analysis of costs, user interviews across the organisation, IT systems analysis, creation of a print policy and multiple optimised scenarios. As long as the deliverable lives up to the associated costs I see no reason why MPS providers shouldn’t charge for it. NewField IT has the benefit of delivering such assessments as an independent consultancy, but the reason our customers pay for this service is because of the value we deliver.

Finally, if you have left your customer hungry for more, the desert might be a workflow assessment, reviewing the most intensive of the paper processes and understanding the barriers and challenges to moving these to a more electronic activity.

The message to every vendor in our industry is that an assessment is not “free”, there are simply varying levels of cost and value. MPS providers should understand the time and value of each type of assessment and at least start by recording it as a cost of sale that effects the sales team. One of the most successful MPS providers in the UK, Danwood, takes this approach and has a growing Professional Services Team, proof that once you start recognising the cost and quality of what you provide in an assessment, then so will your customers.

By taking this approach charging will become easier and the next prospect to ask for a full assessment for free can be refused; if you can do so with Gallic snort of indignation and a shocked look of insult, then all the better!

1 comment:

  1. Robert,
    Thanks for the insight and analogies. I appreciate your professional approach to this topic, as it is the new buzzword among the MFD big boys, of which I am part of as a National Account Manager. I picked up this link from last week's presentation to the MPSA. Keep up the good work.

    Regards,
    A Spurs fan in Southern NJ, USA

    ReplyDelete